Keep Calm and Speak On:
A Closer Look at the Strategies that Incite Student Participation at the Secondary Level
Another
pattern I noticed within my data included the link between engagement levels
and the relevance of the given topic. Anytime I found a connection between
participation and topic relevance, I highlighted the data in green. Looking
through my data, more engagement and participation took place when the students
could make real-world connections or see themselves in the content we were
discussing. For example, in late January we read articles regarding the “Take a
Knee” controversy. The students wrote about their opinion after reading several
articles and watching video clips on both sides. Then, we had a whole-group
discussion. I noted in my teacher
journal that, “The students were on fire! They brought their own personal
connections to the reading and formulated their own opinions within
discussions. Student X brought up the importance of activism in a public forum
and even related it to the Civil Rights Movement.” Along with this lesson, the
question tracker data showed that within the class period, 20 out of 22
students volunteered answers at some point. On my classroom discourse sheet, I
noted that eight of these responses reached the level of discovery. This
pattern of high engagement with relevant topics continued the days where I
purposefully tried to cater to the students’ interests. For example, a highly
increased rate of participation also took place on the days when I incorporated
music, sports, and personal journaling into the lesson.
At this point in my research, I have
meticulously read through my notes in my teacher journal, my classroom
observations, my question tracking tallying’s, and my classroom discourse
notes. I still plan on having students answer the questionnaire and complete a
self-reflection either this week or early next week. While analyzing my data, I
first focused on scanning through the data from my classroom observations and
my teacher’s journal. These two forms of data contained the most writing and
narration of what I witnessed and felt within the classroom over the past three
months regarding student participation and engagement.
While
scrutinizing my observation notes and journal, I started to notice that
patterns were emerging. The first thing I noticed was that there were several
instances when students offered few or no responses to questions I posed to the
whole-group. Within my notes, I noticed fairly quickly that two themes were
starting to emerge, first, confidence and its role in participation, and
secondly, the benefits of giving students time to formulate ideas before
sharing to the whole-group. I decided to code my data by color coding themes,
just as Falk and Blumenreich suggest in The
Power of Questions. When something in my data linked to student confidence,
I color coded the data blue. When something seemed to link more to idea
formulation, I color coded it pink. Sometimes these themes overlapped a bit. I used Google Docs to highlight these moments
in my teacher’s journal and I used crayons to do the same on the loose leaf paper
I used for my classroom observations. When scanning through my journal, it was
clear that I had felt many moments of tension due to a lack of participants
when I posed questions to the class during discussions. This went on for
several weeks until I started to incorporate strategies to overcome this
roadblock. In my data from late February, I start to see less moments of
tension and more moments of success. Looking back in my observations, it is
clear that there were certain strategies that helped students feel confident
sharing to the entire class. For example, on February 19, I asked the students
to identify one of the themes in Their
Eyes Were Watching God. At first, I noted in my observation, “students
nervous, looking at desk.” It was then that I decided to allow the students to
turn and talk for three minutes before speaking as a class. As noted in my
observation, “about 10 students raised hand after partner sharing.” Speaking
with a peer helped the students gain the confidence to share their ideas with
the rest of the group. When looking for patterns in my question tracker and
classroom discourse notes, I confirmed that the depth of conversations and the
frequency of participants did increase after incorporating strategies to gain
confidence, such as partner sharing and think-peer-share.
Going
along with the theme of giving time for response formulation and its benefits,
my data shows that my biggest “ah-ha” teaching moments occurred when I gave the
students opportunities to write before contributing to discussions. Many of
these moments came after students had time to write in their journals before
sharing their opinions on a given matter. Other times it came from class work
lesson. For example, after February break we started to look at the importance
of healthy relations and the idea of “respect.” After viewing a Respect Wheel,
the students independently reflected on which categories were especially
important to them. They wrote for about ten minutes before sharing to the
class. As noted in my teacher journal, “The students had great real-world
examples to share with the class. Student X brought up the link between trust
and equality and how it relates to technology, including not going through your
significant other’s personal conversations on his/ her cell phone.” My other
forms of data also show that engagement and participation were high during this
activity, which come directly from formulating responses in advance and seeing
the relevance to the lesson.
Another theme that
emerged while scrutinizing my data included the pattern that students struggled
to answer questions that required higher order thinking. I color coded this
data in orange. For these moments, I sometimes tried to follow my literature
review’s advice and practice “cold-calling” students. This resulted in many
awkward moments where students told me that they “do not know” the answer. As
noted in my teacher journal, “I felt uncomfortable asking X to identify the
symbol behind the horizon. He looked mortified and after a moment of silence,
responded that he had no idea.” Additionally, I noticed in my question tracker
that the frequency of participation decreased within the lesson where I added
many higher order thinking questions into the discussion. As noted in my
observation, “looking at desks, idk [sic]
(I don’t know) if they are deeply pondering or just tuning me out.” I have
tried to alleviate this station recently by allowing students to turn and talk.
However, depending on the question posed, this can make little change to the
number of volunteers. Going forward, I will try to add more scaffolding
techniques before posing these questions.
Lastly,
an emergent theme I noticed in my data is that structured small groups can
engage all students. After completing my literature review, this is something
that was suggested. I recently tried incorporating this technique in class this
week. I tried it by asking students to present their projects within small
groups and follow some specific guidelines, including taking notes on
everyone’s presentation, offering feedback, and reflecting on the project within
a small group discussion. As I took classroom observation data, I noted that
“all groups following instruction, no one off task!” Additionally, I later went
on to write in my teacher’s journal that, “I couldn’t stop smiling while I
paced around the room. All groups were on task. At that moment I felt proud to
call myself their teacher.” When pacing up and down the aisles, I noticed that
every single student presented and took notes on each other’s work. I would
like to continue to incorporate the structured small group strategy in my
classroom since it seems to work well to engage all students. In previous data
notes from January, I noticed that many awkward moments took place when,
“students sat in their small groups and refused to speak.” Clear guidelines and
directions can help alleviate this issue and build community within my classroom.
Going
forward, I plan to continue to collect data by giving students a
self-reflection and questionnaire on their own participation and learning what
I can do to help them feel more intrigued to engage in class conversations.
Additionally, as previously noted, I plan to start recording some of these
class discussions to ensure that my data is as accurate and plentiful as
possible and continues to follow triangulation. I’m curious to see if any new
themes will emerge after I gain this data and if reoccurring themes will
continue to increase.
Data Chart
Data Source
|
Theme #1:
Increased confidence levels correlate with improved student participation rates
|
Theme #2:
Engagement levels rise when the topic is relevant to students
|
Theme #3
Students Struggle to Reach Higher Levels of Thinking
|
Theme #4
Students benefit from time to formulate responses prior to discussion
|
Emergent Theme :
Structured Small group discussions engage all students
|
Teacher Journal
|
-Many moments of “silence” after posing questions
|
-“Proud moments” occured often when the lesson was catered to the students’ interests
-J Cole, music project lesson and journal encouraged the highest engagement levels
|
-No responses at times when posing higher order questions
-Cold-calling resulted in “I don’t know” and students possibly being embarrassed
|
-Greater “Ah-ha” moments and insightful responses when given the chance to write opinions first
|
-I couldn’t stop smiling while I paced around the room- all groups were on task within the small groups, at that moment I felt proud to be their teacher
|
Classroom Observations (Project Presentations, Journal Discussions, Think-Pair-Share)
|
-Think-pair-share helps students create confidence to speak in front of the room
-Small group projects / presentations ensure all students feel comfortable sharing
|
-Choice board project presentations in small groups- all were on task the entire time (genuine enjoyment, laughter, smiles)
-High participation levels on journals which relate to the course and allow students to put their feelings into writing, which then is shared in small groups, then whole groups
|
-Speaking with a partner first can increase the chance of answering high order questions
|
-The journaling at the start of class connects the content to the students’ lives and the writing piece gives them time to really think through before sharing
-Sharing with a neighbor helps them think through their opinions and get feedback before presenting to the class
|
-Each group followed each step within the small group that was screened on the board, I didn’t have to reprimand or remind a group to be on task
-Each group member was presenting his / her project and giving / receiving feedback
|
Question Tracking (Tracking the students who participate and the frequency)
|
-The quiet, shy students participate the least, yet some are the strongest students academically
|
-Frequency of participation rates drastically increases when students are given a choice and are asked to answer questions that pertain to their own lives
|
-Decrease number of responses when posing higher-order questions
|
-The frequency of reluctant participants increased after “turn and talk” and writing time before sharing
|
-For this particular project presentation, 100% of the students were speaking
|
Classroom Discourse (Depth of the ideas exchanged)
|
-Most answers did not go “off track” and focused on clear response, instead of “risk taking” answers / questions
|
-Students most likely to “discover” when the topics relate to the real-world and their own lives
|
-Answers were either insightful and analytical, but more often were flawed analysis
|
-The time to write helped students think of more analytical- in-depth responses since they had more time to formulate ideas
-There was more “discovery” after the time to write or speak to a neighbor was given
|
-Students were asking each other questions about their projects and learning from each other
|
Student Self-Reflection (After small group Discussions, end of quarter evaluation)
|
Data not received yet
|
Data not received yet
|
Data not received yet
|
Data not received yet
|
Data not received yet
|